|
|
 |
| A Bridge Over Troubled Waters-Facilitator - Agent Proximity |
|
The questions below are directed to people who are involved in "facilitated" or "agent" dependent typing. For this series of questions, I will use the term "facilitator" to refer to a person who provides some type of arm or wrist support. I will use the term "agent" to address someone who serves as a catalyst while holding the keyboard, having physical contact with the person as he strikes the keys independently, and/or is sitting in close proximity to him. Personally, I have also served as an "agent" for individuals with verbal capability through a partition, over phone lines, and by just having a hand or a part of my body visible. (See articles on Jerry and Jimmy) It is possible I even sent over time and space accidentally through intent. (See article on Alex) If you have read my articles, you are aware that I do not consider "agent" dependent typing as independent. In my experience influence occurs possibly, even more, than if I were providing arm support.I suppose it is a partnership, a right brain connection that allow for the transmission of the free flowing thoughts that I refer to as "joining." I suspect that it is this connection that allows access to a higher level of consciousness. I use the term "teaching" or "sending" to indicate the transmission of mental prompts as an aid to help the person become more comfortable with our left-brain linear communication system. (See articles on Sending, Joining, and receiving.) I suspect "sending" and "joining" are two distinct processes with two different outcomes.I have worked with these procedures for many years. I feel a better understanding would arise if people would begin to ask and answer the right questions. I would also like to see scientists and doctors use their diagnostic tools to see what areas of the brain are being activated in each of the partners during "sending" and "joining" processes. Below, I have listed a series of questions, I have posed to myself. I am asking experienced facilitators/agents to do the same.It is the honest expression of each of our aggregate experiences that will create movement toward truth. Please answer the questions as they relate to you and your partners.Questions:Do you as an agent or facilitator need to know the answers to questions asked? Do you believe your partners can communicate in a foreign language that you are able to speak? Do you believe your partners would be unable to speak a language you cannot speak when you are the facilitator?When you serve as an "agent", can your partner type letter for letter and word for word what you send?Do you suspect that your partner's accuracy and flow increase when you use sub-lingual vocalizations along with image sending?Do your partners demonstrate difficulty pairing the written word with objects, actions, and activities?Do your partners lose their accuracy when they are expected to get up and move? Do your partners lose their ability to keep the communication going if you are distracted or get up and move?Do you ever feel your partners are using your words and knowledge base, but not the way you use them? (E.g. different sentence structure, more poetic or prosaic)Do you sense an energy, frequency or soul connection with your partners?Do you ever sense that you help subdue or entrain their chaotic rhythm forming a sympathetic resonance?Do you ever sense a "teeter totter " effect? As you join with your partner and your energies blend do you sense your own vibration is increasing bringing you in contact with higher levels of consciousness as your partner's vibration lowers and becomes more grounded?Do you ever feel that not examining all aspects of the phenomena has been a disservice to these remarkable souls and brought everyone further from the truth?Do you ever question third party influence? (Naive facilitators may be used but others in the room, in relationship with the individuals typing know the answers to the questions.)Do you find words (abstract) are easier for the person typing or selecting from a field of choices to identify than pictures, (representational). Pictures in turn are easier to identify than three-dimensional objects? (Concrete) Do you consider it possible that three-dimensional objects are not perceived the same between you and your partner?Do you sense that the message is only as pure as your own ability to step back and still keep the communication going without undo influence?Do you ever question whether the brain is more a diffusing device than an emanating one-information itself is in the subconscious mind or the soul?Do you sense that your partner is not fully integrated in his or her body?Do you ever suspect that this lack of integration gives them access to the subconscious mind, soul, and spiritual realms? ¹²2Ò³: ÉÏÒ»Ò³ 1 [2] ÏÂÒ»Ò³
|
|
|
